home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: kalypso.cybercom.net!not-for-mail
- From: stok@kalypso.cybercom.net (Michael J. Stok)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.java
- Subject: Re: Readable Perl (was: Re: Relative Speed of Perl vs. Tcl vs. C)
- Date: 21 Feb 1996 07:47:41 -0500
- Organization: Pencom Systems Administration
- Message-ID: <4gf49d$94c@kalypso.cybercom.net>
- References: <4e3a2u$eoa@wcap.centerline.com> <ukd97hwzkc.fsf_-_@linda.teleport.com> <4gb3kp$lu7@gaia.ns.utk.edu> <4ge7bk$4vq@news.ox.ac.uk>
- Reply-To: stok@cybercom.net
- NNTP-Posting-Host: kalypso.cybercom.net
-
- In article <4ge7bk$4vq@news.ox.ac.uk>,
- David Hopwood <lady0065@sable.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
-
- >This (Haskell):
- >
- >cancount n = "I can count to "++(show n)++"\n"
- >concat (map cancount [1..10])
-
- Usually I resist the temptation to jump into this type of discussion, but
- would this perl be considered similar in spirit to the haskell?
-
- use English;
-
- sub cancount {"I can count to $ARG\n"}
- print map cancount, 1 .. 10;
-
- Mike
- --
- Mike Stok | The "`Stok' disclaimers" apply.
- stok@pencom.com | Pencom Systems Administration (work)
- stok@cybercom.net | Cyber Access (play)
- http://www.cybercom.net/~stok/ | The inevitable WWW page (?)
-